Validity of functional patient-reported outcomes in head and neck oncology: A systematic review.

Malignancy and treatment effects in head and neck oncology can be devastating to functional aspects of patient life such as swallowing, blinking, speech, salivation, and facial expression. Historically, the subjective nature of patient experience has resulted in difficulty with quantification and measurement of functional outcomes. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are questionnaires developed with patient input, forming the new gold standard for clinician assessment of subjective functional outcomes. The current review aims to identify and characterize the validation of PROs pertaining to four critical functional outcomes in head and neck oncology: swallowing, speech, dry mouth, and chewing. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for published, English language, peer-reviewed abstracts involving patients ≥ 18 years of age. Of 708 results, 705 were excluded at abstract or full text screening for not meeting inclusion criteria, exclusion of head and neck SCC patients in development, or absence of a functional domain measurement. The three reviewed studies-Xerostomia Questionnaire, Swallowing Outcomes After Laryngectomy, and Edmonton 33-exhibited strong reliability and construct and content validity, though two applied only to individual functional outcomes within specific patient populations receiving radiation or laryngectomy. While many PROs have been developed in head and neck oncology, very few properly employed extensive patient input in the development process. Further work must be committed to increasing head and neck cancer patient input in PRO development, particularly in the functional domains of speech and chewing.

Corticosteroids in peritonsillar abscess treatment: a blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Sore throat is a common, benign emergency department (ED) presentation; however, peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a complication that requires aggressive management. Use of systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) in PTA is occurring without clear evidence of benefit. This study examined the efficacy and safety of SCS treatment for patients with PTA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: A controlled trial with concealed allocation and double-blinding was conducted at two Canadian EDs. Following written informed consent, eligible patients received 48 hours of intravenous clindamycin and a single dose of the study drug (dexamethasone [DEX] or placebo [PLAC], intravenously [IV]). Follow-up occurred at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days. The primary outcome was pain; other outcomes were side effects and return to normal activities/diet. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were screened for eligibility; 41 patients were enrolled (21 DEX; 20 PLAC). At 24 hours, those receiving DEX reported lower pain scores (1.4 vs. 5.1; P = .009); however, these differences disappeared by 48 hours (P = .22) and 7 days (P = .4). At 24 hours, more patients receiving DEX returned to normal activities (33% vs. 11%) and dietary intake (38% vs 25%); however, these differences were not significant and disappeared by 48 hours and 7 days. Side effects were rare and did not differ between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with PTA drainage and IV antibiotics, 10 mg IV DEX resulted in less pain at 24 hours when compared to PLAC, without any serious side effects. This effect is short-lived, and further research is required on factors associated with PTA treatment success.

Transfusion as a predictor of recurrence and survival in head and neck cancer surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: There is mixed evidence regarding the association of perioperative blood transfusion to disease recurrence and mortality in head and neck cancer patients. Moreover, few investigations have examined the effects of leukocyte-depleted (leukodepleted) red cell transfusion. The presented study was undertaken to ascertain whether perioperative transfusion of leukodepleted blood is associated with recurrence and survival in head and neck cancer surgery patients. METHODS: The records of all patients having undergone head and neck surgery for malignant disease between October 1996 and October 2002 were reviewed. Hospital, blood bank, and cancer registry database records were reviewed and data were recorded onto a standardized computer spreadsheet. The primary outcome variable was the number of perioperatively transfused units of allogeneic leukodepleted blood. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression methods were employed. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Recurrence and mortality rates were significantly different between transfusion and no-transfusion groups, in favour of the no-transfusion group. In addition to age, T stage, and N stage, multivariate analysis revealed leukodepleted blood transfusion to be an independent predictor of both recurrence (odds ratio 1.6) and survival (hazard ratio 1.5). CONCLUSION: Perioperative transfusion of leukodepleted blood is associated with higher recurrence rates and decreased survival in head and neck cancer surgery.

Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which method of skin incision has superior cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes. METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing bilateral neck dissection who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled. Each side of the neck was randomly assigned into one of the following two groups: scalpel incision and electrocautery incision. Cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes were collected prospectively with patients and outcome assessors blinded to group assignment. Validated self-report questionnaires and objective scar measures were used. RESULTS: Nineteen patients met the criteria for inclusion. Analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in terms of cosmetic or satisfaction outcomes. Use of the steel scalpel was found to result in significantly greater incision-related blood loss compared with use of the electrocautery blade. CONCLUSION: Steel scalpel or electrocautery may be used to incise the skin of patients undergoing bilateral neck dissection with no difference in cosmetic or patient satisfaction outcome. The steel scalpel yields greater incision-related blood loss compared with the electrocautery blade.